
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Physician CPA for medical practices in Houston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtacpa.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtacpa.com</link>
	<description>Physician CPA, Healthcare Consultant, Certified Valuation Analyst,  Author, Speaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who can form an ACO?</title>
		<link>http://www.rtacpa.com/archives/32</link>
		<comments>http://www.rtacpa.com/archives/32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 21:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.244.53/~rtacpaco/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Accountable Care Act specified certain ACO participants that are eligible to participate in the Shared Savings Program and granted CMS the authority to include other types of ACO participants. CMS chose to expand the list of eligible ACO participants beyond the statutory mandate to allow for innovation in possible ACO models and to encourage [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The  Accountable Care Act specified certain ACO participants that are  eligible to participate in the Shared Savings Program and granted CMS  the authority to include other types of ACO participants. CMS chose to  expand the list of eligible ACO participants beyond the statutory  mandate to allow for innovation in possible ACO models and to encourage  movement away from the current fee-for-service model with the addition  of shared savings incentives. CMS chose this open approach despite  concerns that the inclusion of other providers would not produce the  efficiencies CMS was attempting to incentivize providers to create. (For  example, CMS considered that the inclusion of specialists alongside  primary care physicians in an ACO might cause inefficiencies such as  duplicative or unnecessary lab testing or imaging, but nevertheless included specialists.) Under the ACA and the proposed CMS rule, ACO participants authorized to form an ACO are:</p>
<ul>
<li>ACO professionals in group practice arrangements</li>
<li>Networks of individual practices of ACO professionals</li>
<li> Partnerships or joint venture arrangements between hospitals and ACO professionals</li>
<li>Hospitals employing ACO professionals</li>
<li>Critical Access Hospitals billing under Method II</li>
</ul>
<p>CMS  specifically discussed the ability of Federally Qualified Health  Centers (FQHCs) or Rural Health Centers (RHCs) to form their own ACOs  and found that there is a lack of reporting of the data elements needed  to assign beneficiaries to an FQHC or RHC as an independent ACO.  Medicare, however, recognized  the value of these entities, especially in rural areas. Consequently,  while they may not form their own ACOs, FQHCs and RHCs may be  participants along with other Medicare enrolled providers (such as SNFs)  and suppliers. In addition, in recognition of their importance in the  healthcare system, the proposed rule provides for additional incentives  for FQHC and RHC participation in an ACO. CMS is seeking comments on  whether other provider types should be eligible to independently  participate in the Shared Savings Program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rtacpa.com/archives/32/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
