Income gap between physician primary care, specialties threatens healthcare

Written by Reed Tinsley, CPA | March 1, 2007

As first reported by HcPro (www.hcpro.com), the income gap between primary care and medical specialties is discouraging medical school graduates from choosing primary care careers and threatening the U.S. healthcare system, according to an article in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Some specialists earn almost twice as much as primary care physicians (PCPs) working the same amount of hours. The Resource-Based Relative Value Scale was designed to reduce the inequality between fees for primary care office visits and specialty procedures. However, according to the article, it failed to prevent the widening primary care–specialty income gap for the following reasons:

  • The volume of diagnostic and imaging procedures has increased far more rapidly than the volume of office visits, benefitting specialists who perform those procedures
  • The Relative Value Scale Update Committee, which updates fees every five years, is composed mainly of specialists
  • Medicare’s formula for controlling physician payments penalizes PCPs
  • Private insurers tend to pay for procedures, but not for office visits, at higher levels than those paid by Medicare

Click here to access an abstract of the article.

About the Author

Reed Tinsley CPA

This article is written by Reed Tinsley, a Houston, TX-based CPA with over 30 years of experience advising physicians and medical practices across Texas and the United States. Reed holds certifications as a Certified Valuation Analyst (CVA), Certified Healthcare Business Consultant (CHBC), and Certified Financial Planner (CFP), specializing exclusively in the healthcare sector. He is a published author, nationally recognized speaker, and trusted advisor to physicians on accounting & tax, practice management, and financial planning. Schedule a Free Consultation.

Have questions? I’m here to help.