Don’t Assign E/M Codes Based Solely on the Length of the Documentation

Coding an E/M visit based on the physician’s documentation is an art form -- but selecting a code simply based on the volume of documentation is just bad form. National Government Services (NGS), a Medicare payer in 26 states, recently published its "Post Pay Probe Results for Evaluation and Management Services" on its Web site.

The carrier noted that it downcoded subsequent hospital visit stays that several providers billed because the visits didn’t meet "policy documentation requirement guidelines." Interestingly, NGS indicated that some providers billed based on the amount of documentation rather than what the physician actually said in the documentation.

"The volume of documentation should not be the primary influence upon which a specific level of service is billed," NGS noted in its summary of findings.

The habit of coding based on the length of documentation is common. You should always base your code choice on the documentation’s content.

Have questions? I’m here to help.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Categories
Accounting and Tax Services Litigation Support Managed Care Consulting Managed Care Contract Negotiations Medical Practice and Healthcare Entity Valuation Medical Practice Assessment Medical Practice Brokerage Medical Practice Embezzlement Consulting Medical Practice Management Medical Practice Merger Advice Medical Strategic Planning Newsletter Personal Financial Planning Oversight Physician Compensation Models Physician Compliance Physician Financial Management Services Retirement Uncategorized
About Reed Tinsley, CPA

As a top advisor to physicians, I help increase practice profits by delivering hands-on, expert medical accounting/tax support, practice counsel, and revenue-building strategies. Read More >

Reed Tinsley, CPA