Court rules hospital violated Stark Law

Written by Reed Tinsley, CPA | February 3, 2009

 

On January 21, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit released its opinion in an important case regarding the meaning of the Stark Law, U.S. ex rel. Kosenske vs. Carlisle HMA, Inc., No. 07-4616. The case was before the court after a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants by the District Court on the alleged Stark Law violation, and the unanimous court reversed and remanded the case for further proceedings. Both courts held that the grant of exclusive privileges by a hospital to an anesthesiology group (including the use of hospital-owned facilities and equipment associated with the privileges) could create in-kind remuneration sufficient to constitute a financial relationship under the Stark Law. The courts also held that, under the undisputed facts in the case, the hospital had received referrals when anesthesiologists treated pain management patients who were hospital outpatients, using a facility that was separate from the main hospital facility. The Circuit court disagreed, however, with the District Court's holding that the arrangement satisfied the personal services exception in the Stark Law.

http://www.kslaw.com/portal/server.pt?space=KSPublicRedirect&control=KSPublicRedirect&PublicationId=1836#HH1

About the Author

Reed Tinsley CPA

This article is written by Reed Tinsley, a Houston, TX-based CPA with over 30 years of experience advising physicians and medical practices across Texas and the United States. Reed holds certifications as a Certified Valuation Analyst (CVA), Certified Healthcare Business Consultant (CHBC), and Certified Financial Planner (CFP), specializing exclusively in the healthcare sector. He is a published author, nationally recognized speaker, and trusted advisor to physicians on accounting & tax, practice management, and financial planning. Schedule a Free Consultation.

Have questions? I’m here to help.